Submit If used correctly Is it right to punish someone for a crime never committed?
The Problem Juvenile justice systems handle juvenile delinquents with various problems. After juvenile delinquents conclude their placement, they are taken back to the society. The institutions that handle the psychotherapy for juvenile delinquents are required to deal with a wide range of problems.
Making sure that juvenile delinquents get adequate placement and intervention programs so that they may not return to criminal acts again. Ensuring that juvenile delinquents are nurtured appropriately so that they interact with other people in the society.
Making sure that race and ethnicity does not influence juvenile sentencing. Why death penalty should not apply to cases in which juvenile offenders are receiving life sentences without the possibility of parole.
Placement and rehabilitative programs may be tailored to the needs of juveniles such as age and personal experiences. Race may affect the type of intervention in various ways.
Siegel indicated that it is the juvenile delinquent age and level of offense that structures the type of intervention program to be put in place. Minority juvenile delinquents are sanctioned more severely if their victim is white than if their target is a fellow minority group member; minority defendants who kill whites are more likely to get the death penalty than are those who kill other minorities.
Death penalty for children has little deterrent effect on youngsters who are impulsive and do not have a realistic view of the destructiveness of their misdeeds or their consequences.
Experts say that condemning any minor to death violates contemporary standards of decency. However, arguments for the juvenile death penalty center on retribution and deterrence. Retribution is the notion of an eye for an eye or payback. Retribution should not be used to make death penalty judgments because violence may be used to punish someone without calling the police or using the justice to address grievances.
The goal has been to reduce judicial discretion and to toughen sentencing practices and create mandatory periods of incarceration for juveniles who commit serious crimes. State sentencing trends indicate that punishment and accountability in addition to rehabilitation have become equally important in juvenile justice policy.
Critics remain concerned however about the unacceptably high rate of false positives that result in the unnecessary incarceration of hundreds of individuals. The disproportionate overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities in juvenile and adult criminal justice system raises issues of justice, fairness and equity.
Disparities associated with juvenile race or ethnicity occurs at all stages of juvenile justice system such as arrest, pre-trial release, attribution and placement. Race-linked notions of individual responsibility are tied to an assumption that considerable juvenile justice rehabilitation resources have been exhausted to no avail in the fight against youthful crime.
A court jurisdiction over a neglected or dependent child already may assume that the child is not competent, and jurisdiction over underage offenders in delinquency and criminal cases may need to examine the competency issue as well.
It is important to note that some states have reduced the maximum age of under age to seventeen while others to sixteen. Despite this age threshold, all states provide for processing juveniles in adult criminals court at the discretion of the prosecutor and or the juvenile court judge.
Juvenile delinquents under the age of 16 with clean records should be able to benefit from early treatment and placement programs. The differences between juvenile and adult offenders are too well marked and well understood to risk allowing youthful person to receive death penalty despite insufficient culpability.
The Population of Persons who are affected The population affected by juvenile delinquency in USA is approximately Research from the United States Census Bureau estimated that courts with juvenile jurisdiction disposed more than 1.
This group is targeted by the study because in alone there were arrests for violent crime index for everyyouth aged between 10 and 17 years.
The study id fundamental because the processing of juveniles as if they were juveniles is meant to satisfy community desire for retribution and concern about public safety.
The attention of social work professional is required because many youths in the juvenile and criminal justice system lack adjudicative competence because of developmental immaturity.
Social work professionals articulate that such problems are smaller than secure facilities for juveniles, operate in a community setting and offer creative approaches to treating the offender.
The execution of juvenile offenders does not contribute to the goal of deterrence Levesque, Juveniles have a lesser culpability for criminal punishment and lesser ability to fully comprehend and to function within the various stages of the legal systems adjudicating them.
Increased understanding of the problem specified is useful and beneficial for social worker practitioners, educators and researchers in their work.
This is because it ensures that social workers treat offenders in way that can help them re-establish forms of acceptable behavior in a community setting. The major research questions addressed in this article was if family focused treatment juvenile corrections minimize the length of stay compared to standard programming.
The second question in this study was to determine the group which achieved lower rates of committing the crime the second and third time after getting family related re-entry services and those getting standardized aftercare services. The study used a sample of cases which included cases of youth released from standard re-entry services.Judge Kopf: I would uphold the death penalty for an innocent man rather than play games with the law.
By Debra Cassens Weiss. Posted September 15, , am CDT. Georgia, U.S. (where this Court held to be violative of those Amendments death sentences imposed under statutes that left juries with untrammeled discretion to impose or withhold the death penalty), retains the death penalty for murder and five other crimes.
Wrap up the essay with a concluding paragraph, which will recap everything you’ve said in the death penalty essay. Reword your thesis statement for this section and then give a closing statement. The conclusion should be relatively short, no more than four or .
And I also decided early on that the death penalty was the verdict that I wanted for him. I believe in my heart of hearts that he knew exactly what he was doing the moment before he did it, and. Talk:Capital punishment Jump to If you make death penalty legal, you open the flood gates to death penalty for all sorts of reasons.
(While this may be true for some countries, it is important to keep the death penalty limited to ultimate crimes such as murder, high-treason (e.g. of country and/or humanity) that results potentially in mass. Jan 01, · will be the year the death penalty dies—again?
01/01/ pm ET From assassinations to space missions, was a year of radical firsts in American history.